No Good And Nobody Is All Evil - 1967 Words

Nobody is all good and nobody is all evil. Throughout all history, whether it be in the United States or somewhere else in the world, there has always been people who are infamous for unspeakable crimes or for their tremendous acts of bravery. There has always been people who have seemed to be the literal definition of good and evil and have always been made out like they were exactly that: completely good or completely evil. It’s easy to label a person like that, to ignore any of their other actions that may contradict what the world knows them as, but that’s the thing about labels; nobody can truly fit completely under them. Even someone like Adolf Hitler was once upon a time an okay person before he was completely driven by fear and bitterness to the point he actually attempted to wipe out an entire group of people. The question is, if a person’s actions were courageous or wicked enough, should they only be defined by those actions? Someone like Nathan Bedford Forrest, who was a racist his whole life, someone who was involved in the trading of slaves and even joined the Ku Klux Klan after the war because he was so bitter about the defeat of the Confederacy; should he be defined by only these hateful actions? The answer depends: because while no one is completely good or completely evil-like Adolf Hitler, Forrest believed that one group of people was superior to another; and instead of silently hating, Forrest decided to take action and help fight for a cause that wentShow MoreRelatedWhat is the Meaning of Being Human?849 Words   |  3 Pagesof being human? Everyone has been asking these questions yet no one can actually come to a full on conclusion, what it really is to be human, because nobody actually knows. When we are born nobody is automatically imprinted with what it means, because nobody knows. Sure people have their theories about it and their beliefs on what it is but that’s all it stays, and it remains theories. Throug hout time, many philosophers have come up with plausible, but also contradicting answers to questions beingRead MoreIs Disobeying A Higher Power?1194 Words   |  5 Pagesauthority that put him in prison. I agree with Socrates, disobeying authority is wrong, but the final authority of any situation lies within oneself. Everyone has the right to choose what they do. The actions of a person belong to the one doing them and nobody else. Obedience is an urge weaved inside the very fiber of our existence. Stanley Milgram writes about this in his essay â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† when he says â€Å"For many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulseRead MoreFour Characters In The Graveyard Book By Neil Gaiman885 Words   |  4 Pagesauthor, Neil Gaiman created a spectacular novel called The Graveyard Book. This amazing book is about an orphan named Nobody Owens also known as â€Å"Bod† who was raised in a graveyard. This novel is so striking and marvelous. The significance of these four characters participates in the novel as a whole. Four characters of The Graveyard Book are Nobody Owens/Bod, Jack Frost/Jacks of All Trade, Ms. Owens, and Silas. ‘’Bod’’ is the main character, as mentioned in the beginning, he was an orphan who wasRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of Young Goodman Brown895 Words   |  4 Pages In the story of â€Å"Young Goodman Brown† the setting of Salem village is characterized as a place of evil and darkness. Salem is a place known for witchcraft, especially during the Salem witch trials, were women who were accused of being witches were killed. Most of the story takes place in the forest at night. While on his journey into the forest, the narrator comes a across a mystery man. While on his trip the narrator comes to the realization that he does not truly know the people from the villageRead MoreWhat Are You? How Do You Exist?1050 Words   |  5 Pagesenjoy forever all the blessings provided by him. However, because of the poor choices made by the first pair, we have inherited sin and death. Where does morality come from? Are there objective morals? There are objective morals and standards and they come from the one who created everything else, God. God by his very Person, his ways, and his words, is the supreme standard for all the universe, the definition and the sum of all goodness. What is wrong with the world? Is there evil? Where doesRead More How Stevenson Depicts the Relationship between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde1131 Words   |  5 Pagesfor people to work out for themselves, with a brief explanation at the end of the book. For most of the story, nobody can explain their relationship, as they are never seen together. People are confused as to how they know each other and became such good friends. Clues are given throughout the story that they are the same person; not enough to guess on your own, but so that it all makes sense in the end. These clues include the fact that Hyde once goes into Jekylls home and takes out JekyllsRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1064 Words   |  5 Pagesor his common name, the devil. From an English perspective, he is the first antagonist. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, the Devil is the main cause of conflict. He is the root of Evil. Now the reaction to devilish behavior varies from person to person, possibly even society to society. The Puritan society combats evil doing with actions that could be considered worse than the Devil s worst of deeds. This is demonstrated by Reverend Hale, whose importance starts initially as a figurehead of judgmentRead MoreThe Philosophy Of Human Nature1140 Words   |  5 Pagessimply permits the doer to do evil. In Socrates’ assertion, free will is contingent on self-control because without it, one can find oneself enslaved to a material thing or desire. Based on reading and prior knowledge, it can be deduced that the only thing that can truly keep one from vice is free will. As Augustine examines certain events in his own life, he tries to analyze human nature as a whole, and explores why human beings, even children, have the will to commit evil acts. Augustine believesRead MoreStrange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde1580 Words   |  6 PagesIn this book, there exist a battle between good and evil in the main characters where we are bound to ask ourselves what is superior between good and evil? Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are easily seen as an allegory of the evil and good that exists in men. The book depicts the struggle with two sides of the human personality. Since Mr. Hyde seems to be taking over Dr. Jekyll, one could claim that evil is stronger than good. Nevertheless, Mr. Hyde ends up dead at the end of the story, which strongly showsRead MoreThe Message For Original Audience890 Words   |  4 Pagesthey should move? What strategies does Jesus/Mark use to move them from starting state to end state? Mark presents a confrontation between Jesus and the evil spirits that controlled the man. Mark impressed the audience of the horrible situation the man was in as described in 5:3 using ÃŽ ¿Ã¡ ½ ÃŽ ´Ã¡ ½ ² (not even) á ¼ ÃŽ »Ã ÃÆ'ÃŽ µÃŽ ¹ (anymore) ÃŽ ¿Ã¡ ½ ÃŽ ´ÃŽ µÃ¡ ½ ¶Ãâ€š (no one). The evil spirits were a legion and they attempted to resist exorcism but fail. They went into the pigs and went into the sea. People in the town were afraid of the

Natural Disaster and Possible Harms Drugs Free Essays

Reaction paper: Last July 23, 2011, an orientation on disaster preparedness and prohibited dangerous drugs was held at the CE building during our NSTP. The speaker wanted to make us prepared at all times in case of natural disasters or calamities either natural or man-made. He also enlightened our minds of the possible harms drugs can do to an individual. We will write a custom essay sample on Natural Disaster and Possible Harms Drugs or any similar topic only for you Order Now When we say disaster or calamity, it is a great or sudden misfortune or catastrophe, an adverse or unfortunate event, or an occurrence that causes great distress or destruction. While preparedness means, the  state  of  having  been  made  ready  or  prepared  for  use  or action. So disaster preparedness is in a state of  readiness to contain the  effects  of a forecasted  disastrous event  to minimize  loss  of  life,  injury, and  damage  to  property, it can provide rescue, relief, rehabilitation, and other  services in the  aftermath  of the  disaster. There are two types of disaster, natural and man-made. Natural disaster is the effect of a  natural hazard which leads to financial, environmental or human losses. Disasters occur when hazards meet  vulnerability. Natural disasters are also categorized. Examples: geological disasters – avalanche, earthquake, volcanic eruptions; hydrological disasters – floods, limnic eruptions, tsunamis and meteorological disasters: blizzards, cyclonic storms, droughts, hailstorms, heat waves, tornadoes and fires. While man-made disaster is a  disastrous event  caused  directly  and mainly by one or more individual on purpose also called  human-made disaster. On his lecture on disaster preparedness, he told us that we must always remember the word safety. If you have the right skills that can make you safe, then that’s better. In everything that you do, your attitude counts. Being flexible at all times makes it feasible for us to overcome whatever may happen. And yes, education is very crucial; having the right knowledge could help a lot. Having trainings can develop your skills and it all depends with you. If you put it all together; skill, attitude, flexibility, education, training and you, SAFETY follows. While it may be impossible to prepare for every possible scenario, the important point to remember here is to start somewhere with your own personal preparedness plan. Good preparation will lessen the impact of a disaster on our physical, mental, psychological, emotional and other spect of our human lives and love ones. He also explained to us the effects of dangerous drugs to us and that we should avoid taking such. Take note of the acronym DRUG – danger, route, unto, grave. A drug may be helpful or harmful. The effects of drugs can vary depending upon the kind of drug taken, how much is taken, how often it is used, how quickly it gets to the brain, and what other drugs, food, or substances are taken at the same time. Effects can also vary based on the differences in body size, shape, and chemistry. Some teens believe drugs will help them think better, be more popular, stay more active, or become better athletes. Others are simply curious and figure one try won’t hurt. Others want to fit in. A few use drugs to gain attention from their parents. Many teens use drugs because they’re  depressed  or think drugs will help them escape their problems. The truth is, drugs don’t solve problems — they simply hide feelings and problems. When a drug wears off, the feelings and problems remain, or become worse. Drugs can ruin every aspect of a person’s life. This orientation indeed has given us knowledge which may help not only us, but also other people in the future. How to cite Natural Disaster and Possible Harms Drugs, Papers

Miscalculation or Change of Circumstances †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Miscalculation or Change of Circumstances. Answer: In the general context, the phrase margin of error refers to the small amount that is permitted in case of any miscalculation or change of circumstances. In the legal parlance, the phrase signifies the fact that the juries sometimes make decisions that are incorrect and make errors while making a decision whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. There are several reasons that justify error the juries make while making decisions. They include incomplete or misleading evidence o failure in reasoning owing to the evidence or complexity of the law or the evidence (De Vos, 2017). This term may be described as the rate of accuracy in the decision made by the Juries. As discussed above that the Juries often err in making decisions due to the misleading or incomplete evidences that causes them to take inaccurate decisions. A good reference is the present case 12 Angry Men where the juries merely believed on the testimonies given by the old man and a woman who lived next to the accused boys house (De Vos, 2017). Majority of the juries believed in the testimonies without paying more attention to the other circumstantial facts that were relevant to the case. Any individual who is sitting in the trial for the first time must consider the fact that the juries are persons who have been selected to make decision based on the merits of the case without being partial or bias towards the accused or victim. Hence, even if they err or make marginal error, it is basically due to the misleading ro incomplete evidence that have been presented with respect to the case. The most essential point of issue that had caused the jury members to demonstrate some amount of hesitation regarding the guilt of the accused is when Juror No 8 had presented before the jury, the knife that was exactly same as the knife with which the accused has been alleged to have murdered his father (Rose, 2016). Juror 8 was of the opinion that he bought the knife from the junk shop around the corner of the boys house (Rose, 2016). He wanted to establish that the knife purchased by the accused was lost and somebody else found the knife and murdered his father, putting the blame on the accused person. Juror 8 who initially, was the only juror who disagreed with the 11 jurors and stated that the accused person is not guilty argued this ground. The other essential issue that was addressed by Juror 8 was that it was not possible for the old man to hear the boy say Ill kill you while the el train was passing. This is because it takes 10 seconds for the el to pass a given point and it had been going by the window of the old man for 6 seconds or more. Before the old man could hear the boy say Ill kill you and hear the body fall down, the el was passing by his window and it is difficult to even hear what one is thinking, let alone hear what others are saying across the window in that roaring noise (Gale, 2015). A person who is mentally or physically unfit to carry out the duties of the juror or has been convicted of an offense for which death or life imprisonment was awarded. the person is subject to a bond for exhibiting good behavior. The jurors must be impartial and competent to understand and construe the legal proceedings and other matters relevant to the case while making a decision. A hung jury refers to the judicial injury that cannot come to an agreement upon a verdict even after an extended deliberation (Zucker, 2017). A hung jury is a jury that fails to reach the required unanimity or supermajority that is required to agree to a verdict. All the jury members must agree unanimously that the accused is guilty and that the court had proved that the accused is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. In case there is hung jury, and jurors cannot agree on a verdict unanimously, the case shall be tried again before a new jury. Jury selection is the most important part of any trial procedure and it is equally important that the jurors are impartial while making the decision (De Vos, 2017). However, in the contemporary era, the lawyers usually wish to have jurors who would act partially in favor of their clients. Another essential factor that impedes the selection of impartial person as a jury member is mass media. Jury members are persons who are usually unaware of the case they have been selected to determine. But, mass media hardly make it possible to find jurors who are unaware of cases, especially the high-profile cases in the modern age. Reference list De Vos, W. L. (2017). The Jury Trial in Western Australia: Comparative Observations. Int'l Trade Bus. L. Rev., 20, 287. Rose, R. (2016). Twelve angry men. Bloomsbury Publishing. Gale, C. L. (2015). A Study Guide for Rose Reginald's Twelve Angry Men. Gale, Cengage Learning. Zucker, K. J. (2017). Hung Jury. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1-4.